Former Secretary of State and potential Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton spoke about gun control in her CNN propaganda event town hall interview last night, and she was very clear: she wants “universal” background checks, a ban on “assault” weapons and “high capacity” magazines. None of that is too surprising to anyone paying attention. Yes, the Democrats want to take our guns away, but that’s nothing new. What is a bit surprising (to me at least) is how she described those of us who oppose more gun control laws (emphasis added):
We cannot let a minority of people, and that’s what it is, it is a minority of people, hold a viewpoint that terrorizes the majority of people.
You can’t let us hold that viewpoint? How exactly does Clinton propose to stop people from holding that viewpoint? Perhaps Clinton tipped her hand with that comment?
Clinton said that those of us who oppose gun control “terrorize” the “majority” of the people. How long before we are labeled “domestic terrorists” and “right wing extremists” and “anti-government” because we believe in individual liberties and the right to keep and bear arms? Not long I would say, which leads to an even more important question.
How long before we are targeted by Eric Holder’s newly reformed Domestic Terrorism Task Force? But the Democrats would never use a government agency to target political opponents, right? Oh wait, never mind.
Watch the question and answer below.
Side note: did anyone else notice that Gail Santa Maria, the teacher who asked the question, managed to correctly say magazines and not clips, or magazine clips or some other such nonsense? Interesting.
This change in rhetoric is a bit worrisome to me. Whether it was planned by Clinton or it was a Freudian slip, I think we can call it a clue.
To those of you who vote Democrat in federal elections, I would like to take this opportunity to personally thank you for your role in damaging individual liberties here in America. I hope you’re enjoying that “free” healthcare and your personal helping of “hope and change.”
Sarcasm aside, hopefully you’ve learned from past mistakes and won’t be making them again.
The Democrat voters with hurt feelings will be along shortly.
I’m not sure what I find more offensive. Is it the the fact that she says as a gun owner I am essentially a terrorist (terrorizing my fellow Americans) or that she lumps law abiding gun-owners in the same group as unlawful gun wielders? Personally, I have never “terrorized” anyone, with or without a firearm.
And on a second note, a “minority” of people have been terrorizing the majority of Americans for as long as I can remember (and it hasn’t been gun owners). People that find anything and everything “offensive” have been more influential in passing legislation than any other group. We need to encourage more and more people to vote, voice their opinion, and quit being silenced because we are afraid of reprisal.
I think it’s actually a good thing that gun rights are going to be a major issue in future federal elections. It’s a losing issue for Democrats in the swing states. I can assure you she isn’t thrilled about being forced to take such a leftist stance right now, but she knows it’s going to be necessary to win a Democratic primary.
I usually try to maintain my composure when discussing politics. But I fucking hate that ho.
Amen
Billary is blowing again. Who’s listening? The entire left wing in this counrty that’s who. She’s a real piece of work and she’s a real threat to become our next president.
When someone tells me they want to be a leader, and they don’t understand the difference between an “assault rifle” and an “assault rifle looking” do you just wonder what else they don’t have a clue about?
Sit down you Ho, you have given out enough examples showing how clueless you are.
Those attacking the Constitution should be reminded that there are men and women who took an oath to protect and defend the Constitution from those with the intent to dissolve it; whether they reside beyond our borders or within them. They should also be reminded that these past 10+ years have produced a large number of highly qualified holders of said oath who are still capable of living up to the charges of said oath.
To mis-quote the great Steve Irwin. “If you poke’m with’a stick, ee’s gonna bite’cha!”
And I’ll be dammed if these fu@#ers aren’t running up to us with one in each hand..