Top Categories

Ben Shapiro Exposes Piers Morgan

This might not shock anyone, but Piers Morgan is still pushing gun control. Last night, Piers debated American Republican political commentator, radio talk show host, attorney, and media consultant¬†Ben Shapiro. Ben did a really good job of keeping Piers on the defensive, and didn’t allow himself to be bullied around by Piers.

While I certainly don’t agree with everything Mr. Shapiro said, overall I thought he was great. The video is below and it’s well worth a watch. Thanks to my buddy Allen S. for the heads up.

If you’re interested you can follow Ben Shapiro on Twitter.

,

3 Responses to Ben Shapiro Exposes Piers Morgan

  1. amistoso January 11, 2013 at 11:06 pm #

    There are several good things he said, but there are some areas he collapsed on while talking with Morgan I hate how he agreed and went with Morgan about the term “Assault Rifles”. Also with Gun Registration…BOOO! There are other things i disagreed with, but i’m tired and sleepy, so i will leave it at that!

  2. Psydr January 12, 2013 at 12:04 am #

    Why does Morgan continually bring up that one can convert a semi-automatic into a fully automatic weapon? There are only two acknowledged events of machine gun homocide in the U.S. since 1934, and one of those was committed by a police officer. Ridiculous statement only meant to instill more fear.

    Another thing I just don’t understand: Morgan has been debating gun rights activists for weeks now. You would think he would prepare better. He doesn’t even have the crime statistics of his own country correct. I would like to appear on his show.

    Morgan, if you’re watching, please invite me on your show. I eagerly await the opportunity to debate you on gun control and the second amendment.

  3. J. Wade Harrell January 14, 2013 at 1:29 pm #

    I don’t agree with Shapiro’s idea of a government database to provide background check overall but He did well on most of the irrelevant arguments that this imbecile throws out. Morgan claims to honor the second amendment when it comes to handguns but he completely ignores its reason for existence. He never answered why he didn’t want to ban the guns used to kill all these Chicago children. I guess he believes that Suburban Connecticut children’s lives are more valuable that those in inner city Chicago.

%d bloggers like this: